[nltk_data] Downloading package stopwords to /root/nltk_data... [nltk_data] Package stopwords is already up-to-date!
This document processes the outputs of the praise reward system and performs an analysis of the resulting token reward distribution.
Since praise gets valued on a scale, we can take a look at how often each value of the scale gets assigned by quantifiers. Note: This metric disregards scores of praise marked as a duplicate, since the score of the original is already being taken into account.
The ten highest rated contributions for this round were the following:
| Avg. score | To | Reason | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 73.33 | karmaticacid | AFK til Sept 12#1218 | for attending ETHDenver and doing presentations & panels about our work within the TEC |
| 62.0 | chuygarcia.eth#6692 | for organizing the DAOist, coordinating all the speaker slots, and making sure we have representation from the TEC and from Giveth | |
| 53.75 | akrtws (TE Academy)#4246 | for evolving TE Academy from an unknown tribe into a global organization that is gonna do an immeasurable amount of good for this new discipline: a heartfelt thank you | |
| 53.0 | graial#0787 | for doing more work on the praise spreadsheet export script needed to move old praise into the new system. | |
| 51.0 | sem(🌸,🐝)#0161 | for all the hard work that they put into the open source software that we build for the whole of web3 | |
| 51.0 | JeffEmmett#7202 | for all their contributions, over months and months of work, and for being the inspiration of what our WG has achieved | |
| 45.33 | Mert Ozd#6679 | for the work he does as liaison between PrimeDAO and TEC, educating people about the proposal inverter, how it works, and how to actualize it | |
| 45.33 | Tamarandom#9361 | for her amazing presentation, as we continue looking for how to work things out with these new structures coming up better stewardship becomes key for the survival and success of communities, I've seen quite a few fall for the lack of it. https://youtu.be/7UvPCDbBKcQ | |
| 44.5 | ygg_anderson#4998 | for relentlessly shedding light on the art of modeling and making complex matters so much less intimidating, on the Governauts Rewards Systems program at TE Academy 💡 💙 | |
| 41.25 | acidlazzer#5796 | for taking care of all of TEC's designs |
We can now take a look at the distribution of the received praise rewards. You can toggle the inclusion of the different sources by clicking on the legend.
We can also take a look at the amount of praise different users gave.
Now for something more fun: let's surface the top "praise flows" from the data. Thanks to @inventandchill for this awesome visualization! On one side we have the top 15 praise givers separately, on the other the top 25 receivers. The people outside the selection get aggregated into the "REST FROM" and "REST TO" categories.
Now let's take a closer look at the quantification process and the quantifiers:
To aid the revision process, we highlight disagreements between quantifiers.
This graphic visualizes controversial praise ratings by sorting them by the "spread" between the highest and lowest received score.
Please keep in mind that this is a visual aid. If there are several praise instances with similar spread and quant score, all but one end up "hidden" on the chart. For an exhaustive list, take a look at the exported file "praise_outliers.csv" .
Let's see how different quantifiers behaved by showing the range of praise scores they gave.
To interpret the box plot:
Bottom horizontal line of box plot is minimum value
First horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is First quartile or 25%
Second horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is Second quartile or 50% or median.
Third horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is third quartile or 75%
Top horizontal line of rectangle shape of box plot is maximum value.
Among 1382 praises, 315 (22.73%) do not agree on duplication
Praise instances with disagreements in duplication are collected in 'results/duplication_examination.csv'. To compare, look at the last 4 columns: 'DUPLICATE MSG 1/2/3' and 'ORIGINAL MSG'.
Among 1382 praises, 151 (10.89%) do not agree on dismissal
Praise instances with disagreements in dismissal are collected in'results/dismissal_disaggreed.csv'. You can further look into who dismissed and who did not.